Andrew Patterson Melville (1867-1938) was apprenticed to Mitchell and Baxter; he was to became a W.S. in 1896.
[For correct and critical edition of this letter, see Mehew 8, 2732.]
To Andrew P. Melville [Baxter Letters, p. 358: http://www.hathitrust.org]
Vailima, 18 May 1894
Andrew P. Melville Esq.
Dear Sir,
I have the pleasure to acknowledge your memorandum and copies of correspondence in the matter of the Edinburgh Edition.
![](https://lettersofrobertlouisstevenson.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/image-45.jpg?w=1024)
I certainly feel extremely gratified at the generous treatment I have received at the hands of my many publishers; and I hope I may trust you to convey to them the expression of my sentiments.
One point strikes me as doubtful. I mean the sale to McClure.
![](https://lettersofrobertlouisstevenson.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/image-8.jpeg?w=600)
I suppose he may be trusted to understand for himself the terms of the late treaty; but according to my opinion, the edition is entirely excluded from America. But that is nothing. The question is, whether you have approached my copyright publishers, Messrs Chas. Scribner’s Sons?
![](https://lettersofrobertlouisstevenson.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/image-9.jpeg?w=597)
And what these gentlemen have replied? I have been treated by them in a manner which leaves me very sore. I should not like to repay them in kind. Please call Mr. Baxter’s attention to these points.
I have been running over the text of several of my books with a view to the E.E. The corrections are not many, but some of them decidedly important. For this reason, while I do not think it worth while to send the corrections home beforehand, I should like to make sure of seeing in good time the proofs of the E.E.
Yours faithfully,
Robert Louis Stevenson
You must be logged in to post a comment.